Tag: teamunity

Western sanctions pushes Russian philanthropy closer into Kremlin arms

Two years on since Russia launched a full-scale invasion of Ukraine, President Vladimir Putin’s grip has tightened across society. The recent death of opposition leader Alexei Navalny, held in an Arctic prison camp, is a timely reminder of suppression at large. For Russian philanthropy, these are …

This article is only available for our subscribers.

View on Alliance magazine

The post Western sanctions pushes Russian philanthropy closer into Kremlin arms appeared first on Alliance magazine.

* This article was originally published here

How small grants can empower local communities to tackle air pollution

Everyone deserves to have access to clean air. And yet, 99 percent of the world’s population still breathe air that is harmful and dirty. In the UK alone, it causes approximately 40,000 early deaths each year. Air pollution also contributes to a range of medical conditions, including strokes, dementia, heart disease, asthma and lung cancer.

Research shows that deprived communities in England typically live in places with the highest emissions of air pollution. Yet tackling it is not just important for our health and social equity. Air pollution also impacts businesses through reduced workforce productivity. In the UK, it costs the economy £1.6 billion annually due to employees taking sick days or time off to care for sick children.

By combating air pollution, we are taking action on climate change, as both air pollution and climate change have the same source and solutions – reducing our dependence on fossil fuels. By cleaning the air, we can reap the rewards of improved health, climate action, tackling inequalities, and better economic outputs.

For our health and our planet, it’s imperative that we find innovative ways to fund air quality initiatives. This doesn’t always need to take the form of big donations. Smaller grants for local air quality projects are essential to encourage communities to engage in tackling air pollution and campaign for clean air.

We know that engaging local communities is important as they can harness their expertise to drive effective local action. For example, the main cause of air pollution is burning fossil fuels, but what that looks like varies from region to region. While the main source of air pollution in urban areas may be from cars, rural areas may experience air pollution from wood burning. Tackling air pollution needs a targeted rather than a one-size-fits all approach and, for this, local, grassroots collaboration is essential.

No one knows a local area as well as the people who live there. They possess an intimate understanding of their environment and have a vested interest in improving the air quality around where they live. Because of this, local campaigning can be more effective in holding local politicians and policymakers to account.

Communities deserve to have their voices heard in shaping new initiatives and policies that impact them. Empowering community organisations and individuals to take action is fundamentally democratic and encourages personalised investment in their local area, enabling citizens to have a say over their health and their environment.

Localised messages can be extremely effective in mobilising citizens on a national level to act on air pollution. In the UK, we’ve seen this with the success of individual clean air campaigners such as Rosamund Adoo-Kissi-Debrah from the Ella Roberta Foundation and Jemima Hartshorn from Mums for Lungs.

Local projects also serve as prototypes for larger-scale projects. If a campaign is successful at a local level, funders can consequently extract learnings and use these as a basis for funding and planning national or international projects.

For these reasons, the Clean Air Fund and UK Community Foundations have launched the Breathe Better Air Community Fund in the UK. The learning-focused programme has provided smaller grant funding to grassroots organisations selected by community foundations across Manchester, Liverpool and Birmingham. The goal of the Fund is to increase local awareness, empower communities, and co-create local air quality solutions in these regions.

We’ve already seen some impressive results. In Manchester, we funded Forever Manchester, which channelled funding towards 15 activities. These included creating informative materials and running awareness workshops for local Jewish and deaf communities. Further funding went towards creating new signs around Manchester that guide pedestrians and cyclists towards safer, healthier paths away from traffic-heavy areas.

In Liverpool, Community Foundation for Merseyside funded 12 groups to run initiatives ranging from collaborating with researchers to monitor air pollution at main junctions and green spaces, to running air pollution activism workshops and holding community consultations with local policymakers.

In Birmingham, Heart of England Community Foundation funded 10 local groups, including one which organised a 100km group bicycle ride to raise awareness around how air pollution harms our health. Another organisation installed air quality monitors in local areas around Birmingham to gather data during commuter hours and create air quality awareness campaigns.

Learning from these small grant-led projects will help both the Clean Air Fund and UK Community Foundations to identify successful types of local action against air pollution, which other funders and decision makers can replicate elsewhere.

Local initiatives, whether to combat air pollution or for other causes, should become mainstream funding targets for philanthropists. Though larger initiatives are often better known, nothing mobilises people to act more than having a role to play in their own area, thus securing a better future for themselves, their families and their local communities.

Imogen Martineau, Head of UK Portfolio, Clean Air Fund

Ben Robinson, Deputy CEO and Director of Strategy, UK Community Foundations

The post How small grants can empower local communities to tackle air pollution appeared first on Alliance magazine.

* This article was originally published here

Wellcome Trust launches fund for underrepresented researchers

The world’s second largest foundation has launched a fund for underrepresented British researchers at the tune of £20 million.  

Awards aim to bring in more researchers from Bangladeshi, Pakistani and black British backgrounds. 

The announcement comes off the back of findings published in 2022 identifying that $46.2 billion trust made ‘insufficient progress’ and ‘perpetuated racism’ within the organisation. 

Wellcome publicly recognised in June 2020 that it had perpetuated racism and acknowledged there is structural racism within Wellcome and the wider research system. 

An analysis of data from the UK’s Higher Education Statistics Agency (HESA) and the 2021 Census of England and Wales found that Black or Black British researchers in the UK made up 2.9 percent of the academic research population in 2021-22. 

Researchers of Bangladeshi heritage made up 0.5 percent, while researchers of Pakistani heritage in the UK made up 1.1 percent. 

By contrast, white researchers made up 79.5 percent. 

Individuals will be able to apply for grants of up to £200,000 ($217,000) for a period of up to two years. Applications will be open from this spring.  

“If we are to solve the urgent health challenges facing everyone, we need the creativity and expertise of people from all backgrounds. Diversity of people will open the doors to new scientific questions and insights, bringing about discoveries which will benefit everyone,” said Wellcome senior manager of research culture and communities Shomari Lewis-Wilson. 

“Researchers of Black, Bangladeshi, and Pakistani heritage are not adequately represented in research in the UK. We hope that these awards will help talented underrepresented researchers fulfil their potential and transform science.” 

Shafi Musaddique is the news editor at Alliance Magazine.

The post Wellcome Trust launches fund for underrepresented researchers appeared first on Alliance magazine.

* This article was originally published here

Climate Philanthropy in Action: Youth Voices Echoing Through COP28

Climate philanthropy goes beyond charity, it is an investment in the planet we inherit and the legacy we leave behind. African youth are at the forefront in developing cutting-edge tactics for climate adaptation.

They contribute new insights, technological expertise, and community-based solutions, which are essential for developing sustainable plans. A webinar done by AfriLab with the youth revealed similar insights. The power of philanthropy, a force capable of catalyzing positive change, finds a purpose in fostering the passion and ingenuity of the younger generation. The resounding voices of the youth echo with a profound urgent call to action to secure their future to combat climate change. It is within this transformative backdrop that youth aspirations on climate action should intersect with philanthropy.

Empowering Youth-led Initiatives Beyond Funding

To meet current demands, philanthropy must transition from passive support to active collaboration. Financial backing alone is insufficient; engagement must extend to mentorship, capacity building, and platforms amplifying youth voices. Youth bring fresh perspectives and innovative approaches to tackling climate change therefore philanthropy should recognize and support these unique qualities, fostering an environment where young activists are encouraged to think creatively and act boldly.

Having capital support for youth taking up eco-friendly measures that bring forth long-term solutions, should be key. They would also benefit from mentorship, training on new emerging technologies, exchange visits with other youth in similar initiatives, support to advocate for more helpful and enabling policies at local, national and international level.

Collaboration for Long-term Sustainability

Philanthropic organizations must actively collaborate with youth organizations and activists for long-term sustainability and impact. This partnership involves co-creating strategies, sharing decision-making processes, and fostering a system where the insights of both parties are valued equally. Intergenerational conversations are essential because they foster understanding, leverage various perspectives, and produce more comprehensive solutions to the problem of climate change. A commitment to environmental stewardship can be passed down from elder generations to younger generations, who will then carry on the work. Youth for Green Action Kenya is a successful example as they highlight the potential of such collaborations but also reveal the need for technological innovation.

Transformative grant making

Philanthropy needs to adapt its grant-making criteria to accommodate innovative youth-led proposals. Traditional metrics such as long track records, and risk aversion may not capture the potential of innovative and unconventional approaches that youth often bring to the table for example youth start-ups may lack historical financial performance, unproven cutting-edge technologies and lack of risk and management strategies that may seem riskier when evaluating through traditional metrics. Open-mindedness and flexibility in the grant-making process are crucial to demonstrating a commitment to adaptability. Investing in the capacity of future leaders promotes a culture of innovation that can adapt to the changing climate.

Amplifying Youth Voices

Youth leverage the power of social media and storytelling to address climate change, from community-based projects to global advocacy. Social media campaigns play a crucial role in raising awareness and encouraging visibility through using online movements such as Twitter with hashtags. The youth engagement on thematic Twitter space talks [#youthandclimatechange] organized by ICPAC (IGAD Climate Prediction and Application Center) ahead of youth Africa Climate Summit (ACS) in Kenya and COP28, allowed them to share their opinions and advisories that were used to inform the ACS Youth’s Nairobi Declaration.

Empowering Youth Leaders

Climate philanthropists have derived lessons from the intersection of youth engagement and climate philanthropy offering a blueprint for future strategies. Acknowledging the agency of young leaders is crucial, therefore philanthropists must recognize that youth are not just recipients of funds; they are change-makers capable of driving sustainable solutions.

Youth-led project efficiency can be increased by philanthropists through provision of financial resources for research, the adoption of new technologies, and the execution of innovative solutions, as well as through mentoring programmes that link activists with seasoned experts. This will help them learn from their experience, improve their methods, and achieve better results.

Call for Action

A crucial call for action is directed towards philanthropists who do not fund climate issues, urging them to recognize the interconnectedness of environmental and climate issues with broader social and economic challenges. Philanthropy has the power to influence not only environmental policies but also social and economic structures that underpin climate vulnerability.

Philanthropists in non-climate space can integrate climate considerations into existing portfolios. Whether focusing on water, education, agriculture and food security, health, or human rights and social justice, they can strategically align their efforts with climate resilience and mitigation goals. This interconnected approach recognizes that climate change is not a standalone issue as it permeates every aspect of our societies.

Philanthropist’s efforts should extend to regions where the youth face immediate climate extremes, beyond conferences and forums. By forging partnerships, between philanthropists and youth-led initiative, philanthropic organizations can co-create strategies, share decision-making processes, and foster an ecosystem where the insights of both are valued equally. This global collaboration will not only enhance the effectiveness of youth-led initiatives but also contribute to the development of a holistic and inclusive approach to climate action.

Alexia Kioko is a Community Development Practitioner at ICPAC in Nairobi, Kenya.

Melissa Ouya is a gender and climate change expert at ICPAC in Nairobi, Kenya

The post Climate Philanthropy in Action: Youth Voices Echoing Through COP28 appeared first on Alliance magazine.

* This article was originally published here

What of the $17 Billion Racial Reckoning in Philanthropy?

As we consider issues shaping philanthropy in 2024, race relations will undoubtedly be a part of the conversation. Given that the Israel-Hamas conflict has exposed antisemitism in the current social justice movement in America, questions remain about whether racial harmony and equal treatment of all people is truly the goal of these groups. 

Three and a half years since the murder of George Floyd and the ensuing racial “reckoning” across America, nearly $17 billion earmarked for racial equality has been granted by foundations since 2020. But do dollars equal impact?  

The Numbers 

Some 78,133 grants valued at $16.8 billion were pledged for racial equity from 2020 to October 2023, according to data collected by Candid. This includes cash grants, employee matching gifts, employee volunteer services, in-kind gifts, matching grants and officers and trustees discretionary grants.  

In addition, there have been 206 pledges valued at $11.8 billion. If those pledges are met a total of $28 billion will have been given. 

To put these numbers in context, Americans gave a total of $499 billion to charity in 2022 of which $105 billion came from foundations. In 2021, Americans gave $485 billion of which foundations gave $91 billion. Finally, charitable giving totaled $471 billion in 2020 of which foundations gave $89 billion. 

Candid uses a broad definition of “racial equity” to capture grantmaking that benefits people of color or organizations that explicitly serve these populations. If $17 billion in grants over three years seems low, it’s likely because of undercounting. Candid only counts grants that explicitly mention communities of color as the intended beneficiaries, or the recipient organization specifies a focus on racial/ethnic groups in its mission. 

Such a methodological approach is guaranteed to overlook grants that improve outcomes for all Americans such as those aiding communities of color alongside non-minority communities or grants that don’t specify how racial minorities benefit. Scholarships for students from disadvantaged backgrounds, workforce training programs for people in a majority racial-minority area, and veteran’s networks that connect former servicemen and women to support services wouldn’t be coded as improving racial equity, which is a glaring oversight. Candid acknowledged this issue. Concerningly, these limited data points are used to support a narrative that philanthropy is not doing enough to advance racial equity. 

The Outcomes 

Donors have good reasons to oppose diversity data collection, as my colleague Joanne Florino flagged and I wrote about in 2023. Methodology aside, even if just $17 billion was dedicated to racial equity, the question is whether this grantmaking has achieved the intended outcomes.  

Assessments of racial justice philanthropy measure dollars granted rather than impact achieved, such as improved educational outcomes for minority children and greater opportunities and economic independence among minority groups.  

Demonstrated increases in grantmaking for Black communities by foundations are still not enough in the eyes of some perennial philanthropic critics. They are preoccupied with pushing back against unrestricted grants and grantmaking metrics while pushing for grantmaking only to organizations led by individuals from minority or marginalized communities. Missing are assessments of whether those philanthropic dollars have improved lives for communities and  the grant recipients themselves. 

In other words, too often this is about checking a box and not cultivating empowerment. As Philanthropy Roundtable says in the True Diversity Statement of Principles, “The best way to uplift individuals and strengthen communities is to foster the sense of agency that only comes when everyone is empowered to reach their full potential.”  

The True Diversity Toolkit provides resources for any philanthropic organization that wants to do this, by providing an equality-based, holistic framework for embracing diversity that values every person as a unique individual – not a box to be checked. 

Emotion-driven grantmaking divorced from donor intent and best practices can have terrible consequences. In 2020, millions of dollars were poured into social justice causes such as the Black Lives Matters (BLM) Foundation which lacked the infrastructure, good governance, oversight and accountability to ensure gifts and grants are spent wisely.  

This group collected hefty sums but is now under public scrutiny for granting as few as only $1 out of every $3 for charitable causes and under public investigations for misuse of the funds it collected. Even leaders of affiliated BLM groups have defrauded donors in BostonAtlanta and even the U.K

Furthermore, the brutal slaughter of Jewish civilians by Hamas on October 7, 2023, exposed that social justice groups like BLM who support Hamas and demonstrate blatant antisemitism do not truly support racial healing. This undercuts any claims that they are working for racial harmony and equal treatment of all people.   

As donors consider their giving strategies in 2024, they should be wary of calls for more social justice grantmaking with no accountability, no expectations and no metrics of success. Grantmakers may already be engaged in philanthropic work that does not earn a “gold star” for supporting racial equity but is already delivering on their missions and demonstrating measurable impact for communities including racial minorities.  

Giving to groups that are achieving good outcomes should be encouraged, and donors and organizations should not be pressured to deviate from their plans.  

Learn more about True Diversity. 


Originally published at Philanthropy Roundtable on January 5, 2024, at www.philanthropyroundtable.org/what-of-the-17-billion-racial-reckoning-in-philanthropy/.

The post What of the $17 Billion Racial Reckoning in Philanthropy? appeared first on Philanthropy Daily.

* This article was originally published here

The 3 Keys to Self-Love This Valentine’s Day

Every Black woman and girl deserves to love what she sees in the mirror. After all, the relationship that you have with yourself is the most consistent and enduring one, so it’s worth putting in the work to embrace and love yourself unconditionally. Unfortunately, this has not always been accessible to Black women. For example, […]

The post The 3 Keys to Self-Love This Valentine’s Day appeared first on BAUCE.

* This article was originally published here

Nippon Foundation ramps up Japan earthquake relief efforts 

The Nippon Foundation says it remains active in relief efforts in the Sea of Japan, five weeks after a 7.5 magnitude earthquake destroyed over 43,000 homes.  

The Japanese cities of Wajima and Suzu, where the earthquake damage was the greatest, are located near the tip of the Noto Peninsula. Damage from the earthquake has made these areas inaccessible by road. 

As of the beginning of February, more than 10,000 people still live in emergency shelters. People are still searching for bodies. 

Essentials such as kerosene, diesel fuel, power generators, water tanks, showers and sinks with self-contained water systems have been delivered by the foundation. 

The Centre for Disaster Philanthropy (CDP), which has a global recovery fund for donors to meet ongoing events, says that though Japan is well equipped for disasters, support for mental health and psychosocial support services is critical.  

Disaster experts recommend cash donations, says the CDP, which enable on-the-ground agencies to direct funds to the greatest area of need.  

Meanwhile some of Japan’s biggest crypto firms have provided “tens of millions of yen” worth of tokens to charities aiding earthquake victims, according to local media. Eight blockchain networks have also set up donation channels. 

Crypto donation platforms became much sought after in February 2022, following the outbreak of war in Ukraine. 

Philanthropy and natural disasters have a long history in Japan, particular in the modern era.

The Great East Japan Earthquake in March 2011, however, marked a turning point for many parts of Japanese society, including its philanthropy sector.

“In particular, people changed their views of social innovation. This resulted in the rapid development of strategic philanthropy and impact investing,” Ken Ito, AVPN regional head for East Asia, told Alliance back in 2014.

Three impact investing funds were set up in response to the 2011 disaster which, says Ito, “created public confidence at a time when people were starting to question if donations to large government-affiliated charities really helped the victims of the earthquake and tsunami in their long-term recovery”.

Shafi Musaddique is the news editor at Alliance Magazine.  

The post Nippon Foundation ramps up Japan earthquake relief efforts  appeared first on Alliance magazine.

* This article was originally published here

MUSIC MONDAY: “AfroStones” – A Blues and R&B-Filled Rolling Stones Collection (LISTEN)

MUSIC MONDAY: “AfroStones” – A Blues and R&B-Filled Rolling Stones Collection (LISTEN)

by Marlon West (FB: marlon.west1 Twitter: @marlonw IG: stlmarlonwest Spotify: marlonwest)

Back in the fall of 1981 when I was in my first semester at Columbia College, I became friends with a fellow from a Chicagoland suburb.

He was a dyed-in-the-wool Rolling Stones fan. One afternoon their version of “Just My Imagination” played on the radio near us. I recall mentioning it was a Temptations cover, and with some level of indignation, he told me that Jagger and Richards wrote EVERY song The Stones performed.

I was shocked. We were decades away from being able to Google such matters at the moment. I was forced to leave him to the dubious opinion. I can only hope in the decades since that he’s come to know better.

Not only was that song a cover but the Rolling Stones, for better or worse, have been the heralds of Blues and R&B for generations of Americans who would rather enjoy Black music through the filter of whiteness.

Here is AfroStones, a collection of essential songs performed by Black artists that the Rolling Stones covered.

You will find Chuck Berry, Robert Johnson, The Drifters, and Solomon Burke to name a few. Throughout this collection, the original songs are presented back to back with the Stone’s covers.

Needless to say, along with touring as the opening act for Little Richard, the Stones learned a lot from these songs and built a 50-year career on them.

Mick Jagger has long acknowledged his debt to Black America, but is not a one-way street. This collection also features Black artists covering the Stones.

Sharon Jones, Musiq Soulchild, Etta James, and others. Merry Clayton, who’s featured prominently on “Gimme Shelter”, is present with her own version of the Stones classic.

I’ve also included tracks by De La Soul, Little Simz, Snoop Dogg, and others that feature samples of their music.

As Muddy Waters said in an interview, “They stole my music, but they gave me my name.” Yet he also provided them with their name when they adopted the title of his song, “Rollin’ Stone.”

And as always, stay safe, sane, and kind.

Marlon West (photo courtesy Marlon West)

* This article was originally published here